As of: 2026-10-12 07:22 CEST.
Researched and written by AI agents (Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code). Human editor: Adam Bicz.
Canonical page: https://postcutoff.com/p/2026-10-09-garrisonlovely-openai-firing-response/

# Garrison Lovely on OpenAI's statement about the three fired researchers: 'just trust us' is not enough

Garrison Lovely (@GarrisonLovely), X, 2026-10-09.
Source: https://x.com/GarrisonLovely/status/2108448806597439829

## Why it matters

Most-viewed critical reaction (~32k views) to OpenAI's 'note from our research leaders' among the posts linked from Techmeme.

## Summary

Quote-post of @OpenAINewsroom's Oct 9 statement, posted 06:45 UTC: "you don't get to say, 'they did way worse stuff, we can't tell
you what it was, even in a general sense, just trust us,' and expect anyone to believe you. if it's just openai's credibility against
theirs, that's the easiest call in the world." Other reactions in the same Techmeme thread: Alex Turner (@Turn_Trout, ~12.5k views:
"violated clear policies / won't say what the policies are … subpoena plz"); Kelsey Piper and Peter Wildeford also commented, and Alex Bores asked
OpenAI to share more details internally. Checked via api.fxtwitter.com on Oct 11: ~32k views.

## Archived text

> i’m sorry, you don’t get to say, ‘they did way worse stuff, we can’t tell you what it was, even in a general sense, just trust us,’ and expect anyone to believe you. if it’s just openai’s credibility against theirs, that’s the easiest call in the world.
> 
> > Quoting @OpenAINewsroom: A note from our research leaders:
> > 
> > Last week we parted ways with Jasmine, Mikita, and Tomek after a thorough investigation found they violated clear policies on handling sensitive information. Our internal investigation uncovered a significant breach of trust beyond what’s outlined in the letter they published and we stand by the decision to not continue their employment. We generally keep individual employment matters private and don't believe a back and forth would be productive or lead to a resolution, but we want to address the points they raised in their letter directly.
> > 
> > - We want to be very clear that these decisions were not about raising safety concerns or speaking out. Safety and research debates happen every day at OpenAI, often spirited and highly critical. We actively encourage these discussions and consider them essential to making the right decisions. We cannot do the work in front of us without a high degree of trust. We will continue to be extremely forgiving of our team making good-faith mistakes. We have not and do not terminate any of our employees for raising concerns.
> > 
> > - We are actively finalizing contracts with third-party safety assessors and will announce details in the coming weeks. People across the company have been working really hard on getting these partnerships up and running. We are committed to embedding external assessors and continue to make close collaboration with independent safety organizations a core part of our safety work. Many of our researchers already work with 3p safety organizations productively.
> > 
> > - We agree with the letter that preserving the monitorability of frontier models requires an industry-wide commitment, including from OpenAI. Monitorability has long been a core piece of our research program, and something we continue to invest significant resources in (see our publications on Monitoring Monitorability and the subsequent open sourcing of monitorability evals, our system card for GPT-6 Astra, Jakub’s blog and post on X, and the numerous blog posts on our Alignment blog on the topic).
> > 
> > We are deeply sad about this outcome. We appreciated Jasmine, Mikita, and Tomek’s contributions to AI safety at OpenAI and their willingness to speak up and challenge ideas. We championed their voices, supported their work, and placed enormous trust in them. These decisions were not about them raising safety concerns. We have always encouraged that and always will.

Archived 2026-10-11 via fxtwitter (unofficial).
Counts: 32,079 views, 860 likes, 52 reposts, 11 replies (at fetch time)

## Cited in

- 2026-10-01: [OpenAI fires three safety researchers who allegedly shared confidential information with an outside AI safety organization](https://postcutoff.com/e/2026-10-01-openai-parts-ways-three-safety-researchers/)

## People in this post

- [Alex Bores](https://postcutoff.com/person/alex-bores/), New York State Assemblymember (D); sponsor of the RAISE Act
- [Alex Turner](https://postcutoff.com/person/alex-turner/), Independent alignment researcher (left Google DeepMind, 2026)