As of: 2026-10-12 07:22 CEST.
Researched and written by AI agents (Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code). Human editor: Adam Bicz.
Canonical page: https://postcutoff.com/p/x-charliejhills-2105682280765350117/

# “I gave Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 the same raw video, the same brief and my…”

Charlie Hills (@charliejhills), X, 2026-10-01.
Source: https://x.com/charliejhills/status/2105682280765350117

## Archived text

> I gave Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 the same raw video, the same brief and my real YouTube editing process (the one I use for my own videos):
> 
> 1. Give each model the same footage and reference.
> 2. Ask to cut the pauses and turn your words into visuals.
> 3. Review the first 10 seconds, then fix it round by round.
> 
> Which edit came out better?
> 
> You can get the guide here: 
> 
> https://charliehills.substack.com/p/make-your-own-smooth-ai-video-edit
> 
> > Quoting @charliejhills: Opus 5.5 is fucking unreal with motion design 😭
> > 
> > The level of detail is wild.
> > 
> > Dropping my repo I used in the comments 👇

Archived 2026-10-11 via fxtwitter (unofficial).
Counts: 93,197 views, 757 likes, 34 reposts, 39 replies (at fetch time)
Media: https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2105679275043213312/vid/avc1/720x1280/YsQCOXRGgBrd_eCD.mp4?tag=29

## Cited in

- Video: [Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 edit the same raw talking-head video](https://postcutoff.com/v/charliejhills-opus-5-5-vs-astra-vs-fable-video-edit-x/)