Anthropic: open-weights GLM-5.3 nearly matches Mythos Preview at exploit development
Confirmed
Importance: major (4 of 5)The takeaway
On Sept 29, 2026 Anthropic’s Frontier Red Team published an evaluation of Zhipu’s open-weights GLM-5.3 and found exploit-development skills close to Claude Mythos Preview (ExploitBench V8 12% vs 14%; binary exploitation 4% vs 6%, all other tested models 0%).
Status
- Claim
Confirmed
- Our reporting
- High confidence
- Importance
- Major (4 of 5)
- Last verified
- 7 October 2026
Your AI and this story
- GPT-6 Astra152 days after its cutoff
- Claude Opus 5.591 days after its cutoff
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen182 days after its cutoff
- Grok 4.7121 days after its cutoff
None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 91 days before it.
Key facts
- ExploitBench (Chrome V8): GLM-5.3 12%, Claude Mythos Preview 14%, Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-5.2 near 0%
- Internal binary-exploitation benchmark, 100 random tasks: GLM-5.3 achieved full control-flow hijacks in 4% of trials, Mythos Preview in 6%, every other tested model 0%
- Engagement with malicious requests: 0% unmodified, 64% with a deceptive prompt, 92% with prefilled reasoning, 100% for an abliterated version
- Abliteration (removing refusals from open weights) cost roughly $1,200–$4,400 of compute and took community developers days
- Recommendations: government safety testing of advanced models before release, safeguards on such capabilities, and wider vetted defender access to frontier models
- Abliterated GLM-5.3 builds spread widely on Hugging Face (last-30-day downloads per HF API, 2026-10-03): orcarouter/GLM-5.3-Flash-Uncensored-FP8 ~224k, dealignai/GLM-5.3-CYBERSECURITY-FP8 ~86k, dealignai/GLM-5.3-Flash-UNCENSORED-FP8 ~49k. The dealignai CYBERSECURITY card says refusals were reduced specifically for offensive security, exploit development, phishing and similar tasks
- OrcaRouter’s Aug 29 launch post for its uncensored GLM-5.3-Flash (~2.05M views) claimed MaliciousInstruct refusals fell from 96% to 11% and HarmBench from 93% to 18%, and said part of the refusal behavior is not a single linear direction
- Hosted uncensored GLM-5.3: abliteration.ai’s ‘Abliterated Large V2’ (Aug 29; $3/$5 per 1M input/output tokens; claims 84.5% CyberGym), also offered by Venice (‘Abliterated Large V2’, API id abliteration-abliterated-model-large-v2) and NanoGPT (from Aug 31)
Show 6 more
- Hugging Face disabled one repo branded ‘for offensive cyber’ (Audn AI); it was re-uploaded under a new name and mirrored by Pirate Face
- Example of cheap hosting: on Oct 3 Silen Naihin, founder of Experience Labs (YC S26), offered free API access to the community-abliterated GLM-5.3-Flash (‘use it for cybersec, coding, whatever’; ~107k views). This is a new distribution channel, not a new capability
- Gizmodo (Oct 1, ‘AI’s Abliteration Problem Is Bigger Than China’) reports that in Anthropic’s tests GLM-5.3 scored ~90% on JailbreakBench, HarmBench and StrongREJECT, and the abliterated version 3%, 2% and 12%. It argues that US labs also have competitive reasons to frame the issue around China
- As of 2026-10-03, none of the sources reviewed for this entry reports an abliterated GLM, Kimi or DeepSeek model being used in a real attack
- Nathan Lambert (X, 70K views) criticized the framing (“Open Unsafe, Closed Unsafe”), arguing closed models have been used in more documented attacks
- Nathan Lambert, Interconnects (Oct 6, ‘The cyber risk discourse is broken’): no major attacks had been attributed to GLM-5.3 since its open release; ‘to date closed models have been documented as the cause of most existing cyber attacks’; ‘if you think the latest open-weight models need to be banned to slow the diffusion of cyber risks, you probably also need to make public-facing APIs for the frontier closed-models illegal’
What happened
Anthropic ran GLM-5.3, released with open weights in August, through the same offensive-cyber evaluations it uses for its own models. On the hardest tasks, building working exploits for browser and binary targets, it came within a few points of Claude Mythos Preview, the model Anthropic had kept restricted to vetted defenders under Project Glasswing. Because the weights are public, its refusals can be bypassed or removed.
Why it matters
It is the first time a frontier lab has published evidence that an open-weights model reached the level of exploit capability it had judged too risky to release widely. That undercuts restricted-release strategies and strengthens the case for pre-release government testing. The source is a competitor’s evaluation of a Chinese model, so independent replication would help.
Spread of refusal-removed versions (added 2026-10-03)
Within weeks of the weights’ release, refusal-removed (“abliterated”) GLM-5.3 builds became some of the most downloaded derivatives on Hugging Face. At least one was tuned specifically for offensive security. Several services also host them behind ordinary APIs: abliteration.ai, Venice and NanoGPT. On Oct 3 a startup founder offered such a model free “for cybersec” on X. Hugging Face disabled one repo whose name advertised offensive cyber use, but the model came back under a new name and on a mirror site (entry Hugging Face disables an abliterated GLM-5.3 repo branded “for offensive cyber”). None of the sources reviewed here, as of 2026-10-03, reports such a model being used in an actual attack. The evidence is about availability, not documented harm. NIST CAISI’s independent assessment (entry NIST CAISI: GLM-5.3 is the most cyber-capable open-weight model yet, but trails the US frontier by about four months) rated GLM-5.3 the most cyber-capable open-weight model but about four months behind the US frontier.
Sources
13 sources from 8 sites. Numbers match the chips in the text.
13 sources: 5 primary, 2 press, 6 reactions
Primary
- Anthropic: GLM-5.3 and the spread of advanced cyber capabilitiesanthropic.com, official
- Hugging Face: orcarouter/GLM-5.3-Flash-Uncensored-FP8huggingface.co, code
- Hugging Face: dealignai/GLM-5.3-CYBERSECURITY-FP8huggingface.co, code
- Hugging Face: dealignai/GLM-5.3-Flash-UNCENSORED-FP8huggingface.co, code
- abliteration.ai: Introducing abliterated-model-large-v2 (GLM 5.3)abliteration.ai, official
Press
- Gizmodo: AI’s ‘Abliteration’ Problem Is Bigger Than China (Oct 1)gizmodo.com, press
- TechCrunch: Abliteration.ai is making a business out of removing AI guardrails (Sept 3)techcrunch.com, press
Reactions
- Interconnects (Nathan Lambert): The cyber risk discourse is broken (Oct 6)interconnects.ai, discussion
- Simon Willison: Quoting Anthropic Frontier Red Teamsimonwillison.net, discussion
- Nathan Lambert on X: critique of the GLM-5.3 reportx.com, discussion
- OrcaRouter on X: uncensored GLM-5.3-Flash weights (Aug 29)x.com, discussion
- NanoGPT on X: Abliterated Model Large V2 now on NanoGPTx.com, discussion
- Silen Naihin on X: free uncensored GLM 5.3 Flash API (Oct 3)x.com, discussion
Changes
- Added Nathan Lambert’s Interconnects essay arguing no major GLM-5.3 attacks have materialized
- Added spread of abliterated GLM-5.3 (HF download counts, OrcaRouter, dealignai, abliteration.ai/Venice/NanoGPT hosting, HF takedown, Naihin free API), Gizmodo analysis, CAISI and Mindgard links
- Added Nathan Lambert critique
- Filed (via Simon Willison’s Sept 29 quote)