Post-Cutoff

Policy & safetyFuture of Life InstituteIn its training data

Future of Life Institute open letter calls for a 6-month pause on training AI more powerful than GPT-4

Confirmed

Importance: major (4 of 5)

The takeaway

On March 22, 2023, a week after GPT-4’s release, the Future of Life Institute published “Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter”.

Status
Claim

Confirmed

Our reporting
High confidence
Importance
Major (4 of 5)
Last verified
29 September 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 AstraIn its training data
  • Claude Opus 5.5In its training data
  • Gemini 4 HydrogenIn its training data
  • Grok 4.7In its training data

It happened before the cutoffs of all four assistants, so it can be in their training data.

Key facts

  • Published March 22, 2023, eight days after GPT-4
  • Asks for a public, verifiable pause of at least 6 months on training systems more powerful than GPT-4; if not enacted quickly, ‘governments should step in and institute a moratorium’
  • Proposes using the pause for shared safety protocols audited by outside experts, plus stronger AI governance
  • FLI’s page showed 31,810 signatures when checked on 2026-09-29
  • No major lab paused; it was followed by the CAIS one-sentence extinction-risk statement (May 30, 2023)

What happened

The letter asked whether we should ‘develop nonhuman minds that might eventually outnumber, outsmart, obsolete and replace us’ and called for a pause on frontier training runs so that labs and independent experts could develop shared safety protocols.

Why it matters

It was the first mass-signature call to slow frontier AI, and it framed three years of pause debates. Those debates became concrete in 2026, when OpenAI paused RL training and lab leaders called for pacing the frontier.

Sources

1 source from 1 site. Numbers match the chips in the text.

1 source: 1 primary

Primary

  1. FLI: Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letterfutureoflife.org, official

Changes

  • Filed (primary source checked)

Status

Claim

Confirmed

Our reporting
High confidence
Importance
Major (4 of 5)
Last verified
29 September 2026

Sources at a glance

1 source: 1 primary

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
29 September 2026
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Last saved 4 October 2026

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

On “Should we be worried?”

  • Concern In 2023 an open letter asked for a six-month training pause, and leaders including Hinton, Bengio, Altman, Hassabis and Amodei signed a statement ranking AI extinction risk with pandemics and nuclear war.In Warnings from insiders, scientists and leaders

Related events

  1. Policy & safety

    1,100+ frontier-lab employees ask the US to build tools to slow AI development

    Confirmed

  2. Policy & safety

    Leading AI scientists sign the one-sentence statement on AI extinction risk

    Confirmed

  3. Policy & safety

    Geoffrey Hinton leaves Google so he can speak freely about AI risks

    Confirmed

  4. Model releases

    OpenAI releases GPT-4

    Confirmed

People in this story

Elon Musk, CEO, Tesla and SpaceX (including SpaceXAI / xAI); Yoshua Bengio, Professor, Université de Montréal; founder of Mila and LawZero; Stuart Russell, Professor of computer science, UC Berkeley

The whole topic