Post-Cutoff

Policy & safetyOpenAI and Google DeepMindIn its training data

“A Right to Warn about Advanced AI”

Current and former OpenAI and DeepMind employees demand whistleblower protections

Confirmed

The takeaway

On June 4, 2024, thirteen current and former employees of frontier AI companies (mostly OpenAI, plus Google DeepMind and Anthropic alumni), six of them anonymous, published “A Right to Warn about Advanced Artificial Intelligence”.

Status
Claim

Confirmed

Our reporting
High confidence
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
29 September 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 AstraIn its training data
  • Claude Opus 5.5In its training data
  • Gemini 4 HydrogenIn its training data
  • Grok 4.7In its training data

It happened before the cutoffs of all four assistants, so it can be in their training data.

Key facts

  • Published June 4, 2024 at righttowarn.ai
  • Named signers include Jacob Hilton, Daniel Kokotajlo, William Saunders, Carroll Wainwright, Daniel Ziegler (formerly OpenAI), Ramana Kumar (formerly Google DeepMind) and Neel Nanda (Google DeepMind, formerly Anthropic); six signed anonymously
  • Endorsed by Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton and Stuart Russell
  • Four principles: no enforcement of agreements that bar risk-related criticism; verifiably anonymous reporting process; a culture of open criticism; no retaliation for going public once other processes fail
  • Came weeks after the Superalignment departures and reports on OpenAI’s equity-linked non-disparagement terms

What happened

Lab insiders publicly argued that, without effective government oversight, employees are among the few people able to hold AI companies accountable, and that confidentiality agreements were silencing them.

Why it matters

It set the template for employee-led collective statements at frontier labs, which culminated in the July 2026 ‘Pacing the Frontier’ statement signed by more than 1,100 lab employees.

Sources

1 source from 1 site. Numbers match the chips in the text.

1 source: 1 primary

Primary

  1. A Right to Warn about Advanced Artificial Intelligencerighttowarn.ai, official

Changes

  • Filed (primary source checked)

Status

Claim

Confirmed

Our reporting
High confidence
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
29 September 2026

Sources at a glance

1 source: 1 primary

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
29 September 2026
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Last saved 4 October 2026

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

On “Should we be worried?”

Related events

  1. Policy & safety

    1,100+ frontier-lab employees ask the US to build tools to slow AI development

    Confirmed

  2. Policy & safety

    Jan Leike resigns, saying OpenAI’s safety culture ‘has taken a backseat to shiny products’

    Confirmed

People in this story

Geoffrey Hinton, University Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto; Yoshua Bengio, Professor, Université de Montréal; founder of Mila and LawZero; Daniel Kokotajlo, Executive director, AI Futures Project; Neel Nanda, Mechanistic interpretability lead, Google DeepMind; Stuart Russell, Professor of computer science, UC Berkeley

Videos

The whole topic