Post-Cutoff

Science & mathOpenAIIn its training data

GPT-5.5 Pro finds counterexample disproving McKean’s 1966 conjecture and the Gaussian completely monotone conjecture

Event confirmedAwaiting review

The takeaway

Gu and Sellke (arXiv 2605.11656) presented an explicit probability measure, found by GPT-5.5 Pro, for which the 5th time-derivative of entropy along the heat flow is positive.

Status
Claim

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Preprint only
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
19 October 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 Astra12 days after its cutoff
  • Claude Opus 5.5In its training data
  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen42 days after its cutoff
  • Grok 4.7In its training data

It is after the cutoff of GPT-6 Astra and Gemini 4 Hydrogen, and can be in the training data of Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok 4.7.

Key facts

  • arXiv 2605.11656 (12 May 2026)
  • Counterexample found by GPT-5.5 Pro; proof written by the human authors
  • Follow-ups: a hexagonal multidimensional counterexample (arXiv 2605.18081) and log-concave families (2608.30275)
  • AI disclosure (Gu–Sellke abstract, arXiv 2605.11656): ‘The explicit counterexample was found by GPT-5.5 Pro.’
  • AI disclosure (Zou–Fan–Gao–Wang abstract, arXiv 2605.18081, which disproves the Cheng–Geng log-convexity conjecture in dimension ≥ 2): ‘The explicit two-dimensional counterexample was found by GPT-5.5 Pro.’

What happened

OpenAI researcher Mark Sellke and a co-author used GPT-5.5 Pro to search for a distribution violating a 60-year-old monotonicity conjecture, and it produced one.

Why it matters

It is part of 2026’s striking pattern of AI counterexamples: models proved especially good at finding objects that break long-believed conjectures. Suvrit Sra documented 15+ such counterexamples in “GPT, the Counterexample Machine”.

What is disputed or not yet verified

What is disputed or not yet verified
VerificationUnrefereed preprint (Gu & Sellke, arXiv 2605.11656) with a human-written proof; the multidimensional disproof by Zou, Fan, Gao and Wang (arXiv 2605.18081) is also an unrefereed preprint; no formal proof

Sources

3 sources from 1 site. Numbers match the chips in the text.

3 sources: 2 primary, 1 reaction

Primary

  1. Gu & Sellke: counterexample to the GCM conjecture (arXiv 2605.11656)arxiv.org, paper
  2. Follow-up: multidimensional counterexample (arXiv 2605.18081)arxiv.org, paper

Reactions

  1. Suvrit Sra: GPT, the Counterexample Machine (arXiv 2608.29595)arxiv.org, discussion

Changes

  • Status confirmed → pending (unrefereed preprints, no independent check found); added both papers’ AI disclosures verbatim from the arXiv abstracts
  • Filed

Status

Claim

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Preprint only
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
19 October 2026

Sources at a glance

3 sources: 2 primary, 1 reaction

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
29 September 2026
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Last saved 19 October 2026

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

Related events

  1. Science & math

    OpenAI model disproves Erdős’s 80-year-old unit distance conjecture

    Result confirmed

The whole topic