Post-Cutoff

Science & mathAlexander Perry and OpenAI35 days after June 2026

Alexander Perry disproves the period-index conjecture

A flawed ChatGPT example was the starting point

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Importance: major (4 of 5)

The takeaway

Alexander Perry posted counterexamples to the period-index conjecture for Brauer classes: d-dimensional varieties (d ≥ 3) with a Brauer class of period 2 and index 2^d (arXiv 2608.03684; v1 4 Aug, v2 3 Sep 2026).

Status
Claim

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Preprint only
Importance
Major (4 of 5)
Last verified
30 September 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 Astra96 days after its cutoff
  • Claude Opus 5.535 days after its cutoff
  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen126 days after its cutoff
  • Grok 4.765 days after its cutoff

None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 35 days before it.

Key facts

  • Period-index conjecture: stated by Colliot-Thélène in 2001; predicts the index of a Brauer class on a d-dimensional variety divides period^(d−1)
  • Result: failures in dimension 3 over Q and F_p(t), and in all dimensions d ≥ 3 over C and F_p((t)); the lower bound on the index uses a motivic obstruction, namely the non-existence of integral Hodge or Tate classes satisfying an equation mod 2
  • Perry proposes a corrected period-index conjecture with corrections at small primes and proves its Hodge-theoretic counterpart
  • AI disclosure, §1.7: prompted to use the paper’s Hodge-theoretic strategy, ChatGPT ‘produced a flawed example of a threefold X and Brauer class α’ that ‘had some features of our final solution’; ‘Drawing inspiration from this failed example, the author eventually discovered Theorem 1.3’; ChatGPT then ‘assisted with literature searches and lattice theory calculations’. The paper was written by the author
  • Status: preprint, not peer-reviewed

What happened

Perry, who had earlier worked with de Jong on the Hodge theory of the period-index problem, asked ChatGPT to look for a counterexample along that strategy. The model’s example was wrong, but its shape pointed Perry to a correct construction built from K3 surfaces with symplectic group actions.

Why it matters

The period-index conjecture was a central open question on Brauer groups of function fields. It is also an example of an AI error being productive: the model gave the idea and a human supplied the correct mathematics.

What is disputed or not yet verified

What is disputed or not yet verified
VerificationPreprint by an expert in the field; not peer-reviewed

Sources

1 source from 1 site. Numbers match the chips in the text.

1 source: 1 primary

Primary

  1. arXiv 2608.03684: The period-index conjecture is false for motivic reasons (Perry)arxiv.org, paper

Changes

  • Filed

Status

Claim

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Preprint only
Importance
Major (4 of 5)
Last verified
30 September 2026

Sources at a glance

1 source: 1 primary

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
30 September 2026
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Last saved 4 October 2026

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

Related events

  1. Science & math

    Summer 2026 flood: dozens of named conjectures settled on arXiv with disclosed AI help

    Awaiting review

The whole topic