Post-Cutoff

Science & mathLean FRO and ICARM49 days after June 2026

Palomar launches: a registry of Lean-verified mathematics to curb misrepresented AI proof claims

Result confirmed

The takeaway

On 18 Aug 2026 the Lean FRO and ICARM launched Palomar (palomar-registry.org), “the analogue of a preprint server for Lean proofs”.

Status
Claim

Result confirmed

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Lean-verified
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
29 October 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 Astra110 days after its cutoff
  • Claude Opus 5.549 days after its cutoff
  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen140 days after its cutoff
  • Grok 4.779 days after its cutoff

None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 49 days before it.

Key facts

  • Each entry: a human-readable challenge file, a solution module with the formal proof, and a formalization.yaml with informal description and metadata
  • Automated checks: mechanical verification via leanprover/comparator plus LLM-based semantic-alignment check
  • Scientific advisory board incl. Jeremy Avigad, Matthew Ballard, Jaume de Dios, Nestor Guillen, Bryna Kra, Kim Morrison, Terence Tao, Ravi Vakil, Akshay Venkatesh
  • First entry PALOMAR-2026-08-13-000001 (teorth/sendov, the Sendov conjecture formalisation)
  • Aim: minimal safeguard against misrepresentation of AI claims, not a judgement of novelty or significance
  • 29 Oct 2026: Google DeepMind’s formal-conjectures repository made Palomar links mandatory: a new linter (linter.style.formal_proof_palomar, on by default) requires every formal proof of a ‘research solved’ problem, including conditional ones, to link to a Palomar entry; the 1,096 existing non-Palomar proof annotations on 1,070 declarations in 734 problem files got local opt-outs (commit d9f6ffa, PR #7631)

What happened

As AI systems produced Lean proofs of old and new results at a growing rate, the Lean community set up a registry that makes formal claims inspectable and checks mechanically that a formal statement matches what is claimed informally.

Why it matters

Formal verification became the main way to trust AI mathematics in 2026. Palomar supplies the missing public infrastructure: a place where “proved in Lean” can be checked rather than asserted.

Sources

6 sources from 3 sites. Numbers match the chips in the text.

6 sources: 6 primary

Primary

  1. Palomar registrypalomar-registry.org, official
  2. Terence Tao: Palomar, a registry of Lean-verified mathematicsterrytao.wordpress.com, official
  3. Palomar statementpalomar-registry.org, official
  4. GitHub: leanprover/comparatorgithub.com, code
  5. GitHub: mathlib-initiative/formalization.yamlgithub.com, code
  6. formal-conjectures commit d9f6ffa: add linter to enforce Palomar submissions (#7631)github.com, code

Changes

  • Added formal-conjectures’ Palomar linter
  • Filed

Status

Claim

Result confirmed

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Lean-verified
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
29 October 2026

Sources at a glance

6 sources: 6 primary

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
29 September 2026
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Last saved 29 October 2026

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

Related events

  1. Open source

    SAIR launches the Open Math Model initiative for community-governed open-weight math AI, plus Lean Kernel and Andrews–Curtis challenges

    Confirmed

  2. Science & math

    Sendov’s 1958 conjecture on polynomial roots proved with GPT-5.6 Pro

    Result confirmed

People in this story

Terence Tao, Professor of mathematics, UCLA

The whole topic