Post-Cutoff

Science & mathRodrigo Nicolau Almeida, Søren Brinck Knudstorp, OpenAI and Anthropic73 days after June 2026

Medvedev’s logic of finite problems (1962) shown undecidable

Key idea from ChatGPT Sol 5.6, central argument checked in Lean by Claude Opus 5

Event confirmedAwaiting review

The takeaway

Rodrigo Nicolau Almeida and Søren Brinck Knudstorp proved that Medvedev’s logic of finite problems, a well-known superintuitionistic logic, is undecidable, which settles what they call a longstanding open problem (arXiv 2609.13359, 11 Sep 2026).

Status
Claim

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Lean-verified
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
29 October 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 Astra134 days after its cutoff
  • Claude Opus 5.573 days after its cutoff
  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen164 days after its cutoff
  • Grok 4.7103 days after its cutoff

None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 73 days before it.

Key facts

  • Medvedev introduced the logic of finite problems in 1962 (Dokl. Akad. Nauk 142); whether it is decidable was a longstanding open question
  • Main theorem: Medvedev’s logic ML is undecidable, via a reduction from periodic tiling to non-theoremhood; similarly Skvortsov’s logic of infinite problems is undecidable, and the two logics are separated by any aperiodic tiling of the plane
  • Methodology §7: ‘the key idea for the undecidability of ML – namely the construction of the tiling posets P_W, and the encoding of the reduction – was obtained by prompting ChatGPT Sol 5.6 … whilst the authors assume responsibility for the correctness of the results, they do not take any credit in such ideas’
  • The authors rewrote the text themselves and invoke the Leiden Declaration; Claude Opus 5 was used for proofreading and for a Lean verification of the main central argument; prompts, preliminary documents and verification ledgers are public on the first author’s website
  • Status: preprint (32 pages)
  • Follow-up: Han Xiao (arXiv 2609.39577, 30 Sep 2026) proves the logic Cheq is not finitely axiomatizable (a human result ‘established before the rise of AI’) and that Medvedev’s undecidability implies Cheq’s; the paper notes Theorem 6.2 ‘does use the AI-generated proof that Medvedev logic is undecidable’
  • AI disclosure (abstract, arXiv 2609.13359): ‘The core idea and technical work of the undecidability proof were obtained using ChatGPT Sol 5.6, and formally verified in Lean by Claude Opus 5.’ arXiv comment: ‘main result obtained via LLM (see methodology section)’

What happened

Two logicians, one of whom wrote his PhD on undecidability, suspected a targeted search could settle Medvedev’s logic. They prompted ChatGPT Sol 5.6, which returned a tiling-based reduction on 4 September. Claude Opus 5 formalised the central argument in Lean, and the authors wrote the paper and published the whole prompt trail.

Why it matters

It answers a well-known question in non-classical logic, and other logicians already build on it: on 30 September Han Xiao derived the undecidability of the logic Cheq from it, citing “the AI-generated proof”. It is also a model of transparent disclosure: full prompt and output archives are published alongside the paper and treated like a dataset.

What is disputed or not yet verified

What is disputed or not yet verified
VerificationUnrefereed preprint; central argument verified in Lean by Claude Opus 5 (per the authors), not the whole paper; proofs checked and rewritten by the authors

Sources

2 sources from 1 site. Numbers match the chips in the text.

2 sources: 2 primary

Primary

  1. arXiv 2609.13359: Medvedev logic is undecidable (Almeida, Knudstorp)arxiv.org, paper
  2. arXiv 2609.39577: Non-finite axiomatizability and undecidability of Cheq (Han Xiao)arxiv.org, paper

Changes

Status

Claim

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Lean-verified
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
29 October 2026

Sources at a glance

2 sources: 2 primary

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
30 September 2026
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Last saved 29 October 2026

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

Related events

  1. Science & math

    October 2026: the arXiv stream of conjectures settled with disclosed AI help continues

    Awaiting review

  2. Science & math

    Periodic tiling conjecture fails in dimension 3 (OpenAI claim, Lean-checked)

    Awaiting review

  3. Science & math

    Summer 2026 flood: dozens of named conjectures settled on arXiv with disclosed AI help

    Awaiting review

  4. Model releases

    Anthropic releases Claude Opus 5

    Confirmed

  5. Model releases

    OpenAI broadly releases GPT-5.6 after government-gated preview

    Confirmed

  6. Policy & safety

    Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics sets community norms for AI in maths (4,000+ signatories)

    Partly confirmed

The whole topic