Medvedev’s logic of finite problems (1962) shown undecidable
Key idea from ChatGPT Sol 5.6, central argument checked in Lean by Claude Opus 5
Event confirmedAwaiting review
The takeaway
Rodrigo Nicolau Almeida and Søren Brinck Knudstorp proved that Medvedev’s logic of finite problems, a well-known superintuitionistic logic, is undecidable, which settles what they call a longstanding open problem (arXiv 2609.13359, 11 Sep 2026).
Status
- Claim
Event confirmedAwaiting review
- Our reporting
- High confidence
- Verification
- Lean-verified
- Importance
- 3 of 5
- Last verified
- 29 October 2026
Your AI and this story
- GPT-6 Astra134 days after its cutoff
- Claude Opus 5.573 days after its cutoff
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen164 days after its cutoff
- Grok 4.7103 days after its cutoff
None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 73 days before it.
Key facts
- Medvedev introduced the logic of finite problems in 1962 (Dokl. Akad. Nauk 142); whether it is decidable was a longstanding open question
- Main theorem: Medvedev’s logic ML is undecidable, via a reduction from periodic tiling to non-theoremhood; similarly Skvortsov’s logic of infinite problems is undecidable, and the two logics are separated by any aperiodic tiling of the plane
- Methodology §7: ‘the key idea for the undecidability of ML – namely the construction of the tiling posets P_W, and the encoding of the reduction – was obtained by prompting ChatGPT Sol 5.6 … whilst the authors assume responsibility for the correctness of the results, they do not take any credit in such ideas’
- The authors rewrote the text themselves and invoke the Leiden Declaration; Claude Opus 5 was used for proofreading and for a Lean verification of the main central argument; prompts, preliminary documents and verification ledgers are public on the first author’s website
- Status: preprint (32 pages)
- Follow-up: Han Xiao (arXiv 2609.39577, 30 Sep 2026) proves the logic Cheq is not finitely axiomatizable (a human result ‘established before the rise of AI’) and that Medvedev’s undecidability implies Cheq’s; the paper notes Theorem 6.2 ‘does use the AI-generated proof that Medvedev logic is undecidable’
- AI disclosure (abstract, arXiv 2609.13359): ‘The core idea and technical work of the undecidability proof were obtained using ChatGPT Sol 5.6, and formally verified in Lean by Claude Opus 5.’ arXiv comment: ‘main result obtained via LLM (see methodology section)’
What happened
Two logicians, one of whom wrote his PhD on undecidability, suspected a targeted search could settle Medvedev’s logic. They prompted ChatGPT Sol 5.6, which returned a tiling-based reduction on 4 September. Claude Opus 5 formalised the central argument in Lean, and the authors wrote the paper and published the whole prompt trail.
Why it matters
It answers a well-known question in non-classical logic, and other logicians already build on it: on 30 September Han Xiao derived the undecidability of the logic Cheq from it, citing “the AI-generated proof”. It is also a model of transparent disclosure: full prompt and output archives are published alongside the paper and treated like a dataset.
What is disputed or not yet verified
| Verification | Unrefereed preprint; central argument verified in Lean by Claude Opus 5 (per the authors), not the whole paper; proofs checked and rewritten by the authors |
|---|
Sources
2 sources from 1 site. Numbers match the chips in the text.
2 sources: 2 primary
Primary
Changes
- Related: added Periodic tiling conjecture fails in dimension 3 (OpenAI claim, Lean-checked) (OpenAI’s claimed 3D translational tile with no periodic tiling)
- Status confirmed → pending (unrefereed; Lean covers the central argument only); added the abstract’s AI disclosure verbatim
- Related: added October 2026: the arXiv stream of conjectures settled with disclosed AI help continues (October catalogue, split out of the summer catalogue)
- Added Han Xiao’s Cheq follow-up (arXiv 2609.39577), which builds on the AI-generated undecidability proof
- Filed