Chromatic number of the plane is 6 or 7, OpenAI claims (Lean)
Awaiting review
Importance: historic (5 of 5)The takeaway
A 62-page manuscript credited to ‘OpenAI’ (dated 23 Sept, public on 6 Oct) claims that every 5-colouring of the plane has two points at distance one with the same colour, with no regularity assumed on the colour classes. That raises de Grey’s 2018 lower bound of five to six, so the chromatic number of the plane is 6 or 7. The proof first transfers arbitrary colourings to a weak measurability condition, then rules out five colours under it. It is formalized in Lean and passed a community comparator run and a stricter independent check. Mathematicians called the method unlike anything in the prior literature; by compactness a finite non-5-colourable unit-distance graph must exist, but none has been displayed.
Status
- Claim
Awaiting review
- Our reporting
- Medium confidence
- Verification
- Peer-reviewed
- Importance
- Historic (5 of 5)
- Last verified
- 29 October 2026
Your AI and this story
- GPT-6 Astra159 days after its cutoff
- Claude Opus 5.598 days after its cutoff
- Gemini 4 Argon189 days after its cutoff
- Grok 4.7128 days after its cutoff
None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 98 days before it.
Key facts
- Manuscript (abstract, verbatim): ‘We prove that every coloring of the Euclidean plane with five colors has a monochromatic unit-distance pair, with no regularity assumption on the color classes. Consequently, the chromatic number of the plane is either six or seven.’ 62 pages, dated 23 Sept 2026. Theorem 1.1 is proved in ZFC; ‘The remaining alternatives six and seven are unresolved’
- Structure (paper): ‘a transfer from unrestricted proper colorings to a measurable condition, and a geometric obstruction to five labels under that condition. The transfer holds for every finite number of colors.’ Because of the de Bruijn–Erdős compactness theorem, ‘an unrestricted lower bound can also be established without first displaying a finite graph witnessing it’; the final step reuses the Moser spindle
- Before: Nelson (1950) and Isbell gave the bounds 4 and 7; Aubrey de Grey’s 2018 finite unit-distance graph (1,581 vertices after correction) raised the lower bound to 5, later shrunk by Heule (553 vertices) and Parts (509); for measurable colour classes Falconer had proved at least 5 colours (as recounted in the paper)
- Lean (OpenAI scope note lean/docs/158.md): ‘The formalized results prove that five colors do not suffice and that seven colors do suffice. The lower bound applies to arbitrary colorings, with no measurability or continuity assumption.’ Both challenges ‘accepted’ in the oai-math-revised comparator run (25–26 Oct). Caveat recorded there: the EuclideanFiveColor configuration let the comparator check the definition ProperColoring by type only; OpenAI emptied that list on 26 Oct. Carlos Toledo’s audit had flagged that this one definition ‘carries the whole conclusion’, ran a strict body-by-body comparison, and later lists EuclideanFiveColor as certified after the change
- No explicit witness: Toledo’s audit notes that ‘the finite non-5-colorable unit-distance graph is obtained by compactness and never displayed’, while certifying the paper’s finite Moser-spindle certificate in exact arithmetic
- Reactions: Joshua Zelinsky (Bluesky, 6 Oct): ‘it doesn’t look like the method is a direction that the prior lit used to my knowledge. This is far beyond merely building on existing methods’. Dmitry Rybin (X, 7 Oct, about 261k views): ‘I was trying to read the OpenAI proof that chromatic number of a plane is >= 6. But it is totally unbelievable alien math?’, adding that the model found that any K-colouring is equivalent to a ‘weakly measurable’ one. Gabriel Gaster (X, 9 Oct) pointed to its mix of ‘Pontryagin duality, ergodic theory, and amenable groups’. Gil Kalai (7 Oct): ‘The new manuscript raises the lower bound to six’. Thomas Bloom lists it under Erdős problem #508, noting ‘This proof has been formalised’
- Follow-ups: Koshelev, Kupavskii and Voronov (arXiv 2610.18907, 11 Oct): ‘Using the planar character-law rigidity theorem of OpenAI, we prove that every finite proper coloring of R³ can be replaced by a proper Lebesgue-measurable coloring with the same number of colors’, so the ordinary and measurable chromatic numbers of R³ are equal; they used ChatGPT 6 Astra to extract the main ideas of OpenAI’s preprint. Henry Bass’s GitHub repository extends the transfer theorem to R^n with AI-assisted preprints and Lean
What happened
The Hadwiger–Nelson problem asks how many colours are needed to colour the plane so that points at distance exactly one always get different colours. Since 1950 the answer was known to lie between 4 and 7. In 2018 the amateur mathematician Aubrey de Grey raised the lower bound to 5 with a finite graph of unit distances that cannot be 4-coloured.
OpenAI’s 6 Oct release claims 6, so that only 6 and 7 remain. Instead of a larger finite graph, the 62-page manuscript proves that any proper colouring with finitely many colours can be replaced by one with a weak measurability property. It then shows that five colours are impossible under that property. Compactness implies that a finite non-5-colourable unit-distance graph exists, but the paper does not construct one. Both bounds are formalized in Lean. A comparator caveat about how one definition was checked was closed by an independent audit and by OpenAI’s 26 Oct configuration fix.
Why it matters
The chromatic number of the plane is one of the best-known open problems in combinatorics, and this would be the first step since 2018. Readers note that the method is new rather than a heavier version of de Grey’s approach, and other authors have already reused it in three dimensions. The claim is formally checked, so the open questions are whether the formal definitions match the classical problem and what the finite witness looks like.
What is disputed or not yet verified
| Verification | Lean formalization accepted by an independent comparator run and certified by a stricter definition-body check after OpenAI’s 26 Oct configuration fix; unrefereed manuscript; finite witness graph not exhibited |
|---|
Sources
10 sources from 7 sites. Numbers match the chips in the text.
10 sources: 5 primary, 5 reactions
Primary
- OpenAI (PDF): The Euclidean plane is not five-colorable (23 Sept 2026)github.com, paper
- OpenAI Lean scope note for family 158github.com, code
- oai-math-revised comparator results and LEAN_CHECKS (EuclideanFiveColor, PlaneColoring accepted; definition caveat)github.com, code
- arXiv 2610.18907: Koshelev, Kupavskii & Voronov, Ordinary and measurable colorings of Euclidean three-spacearxiv.org, paper
- GitHub: outsidetext/euclidean-chromatic-transfer (Henry Bass, extensions to R^n)github.com, code
Reactions
- Carlos Toledo: OpenAI’s math release, what it claims beyond what it checks (findings G7, G10)carlostoledo.co, discussion
- Dmitry Rybin on X: ‘totally unbelievable alien math?’ (7 Oct)x.com, discussion
- Joshua Zelinsky on Bluesky (6 Oct)bsky.app, discussion
- Thomas Bloom: Erdős problems in the OpenAI proofs (problem #508)erdosproblems.com, discussion
- Gil Kalai: Updates: Sharing AI progress on mathematics (amazing!) (7 Oct)gilkalai.wordpress.com, discussion
Changes
- Filed (CONTENTS entry, PDF (62 pp), Lean scope note, comparator results and LEAN_CHECKS, Bloom, Kalai, posts on X and Bluesky fetched via fxtwitter and the public Bluesky API, Koshelev–Kupavskii–Voronov abstract)