Post-Cutoff

Science & mathEPFL, Google Research, Carnegie Mellon University, New York University and OpenAI105 days after June 2026

k-median breaks the factor-2 barrier

EPFL-led team gives a 1.95-LMP algorithm; GPT-6 Astra pushes it to 1.844 and proves a 1.8 limit, both with Lean certificates

Event confirmedAwaiting review

The takeaway

A human-proved 1.95-LMP algorithm, with a companion paper, gives a better-than-2 approximation for metric k-median. GPT-6 Astra improved the ratio of the same method to 1.844 and proved the method cannot go below 1.8, with Lean certificates. The paper says OpenAI announced other better-than-2 algorithms on 6 Oct.

Status
Claim

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Lean-verified
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
14 October 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 Astra166 days after its cutoff
  • Claude Opus 5.5105 days after its cutoff
  • Gemini 4 Argon196 days after its cutoff
  • Grok 4.7135 days after its cutoff

None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 105 days before it.

Key facts

  • Paper: arXiv 2610.18144 [cs.DS], 13 Oct 2026; authors at EPFL, Google Research, Carnegie Mellon and NYU (incl. Ola Svensson, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Anupam Gupta)
  • Main result: a polynomial-time 1.95-LMP (Lagrangian-multiplier-preserving) approximation for facility location using the bid β(α, d) = [α − 1.224 d]+; the previous best LMP factor was 2 − η with η ≈ 2.25 × 10⁻⁷ (Cohen-Addad, Grandoni, Lee, Schwiegelshohn)
  • k-median: a 1.95-approximation opening k + O(log n) centers; with a (1.89 + ε)-approximation for stable instances in the companion Part II, this gives a better-than-2 polynomial-time approximation. Prior state: (2 + ε) (Cohen-Addad et al. 2025; Byrka et al. 2026); k-median is hard to approximate below 1 + 2/e
  • GPT-6 Astra (Remark 1.5): ‘GPT-6 Astra managed to improve the LMP approximation ratio to 1.844’, with a 13-term bidding function, and ‘managed to prove that for any admissible bidding function … the supremum of the factor revealing program … has value at least 1.8’, so the approach cannot go below 1.8
  • AI statement: ‘The mathematical proofs presented in this work (apart from Remark 1.5) were developed solely by the authors without the use of AI.’ GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Astra were used for proof-checking and writing help; ‘The lean certificates mentioned in Remark 1.5 and the certificate for Theorem 4.4 were obtained by GPT-6 Astra’
  • Lean certificates: github.com/epfl-thl2/project-k-median (reachable on 14 Oct 2026)
  • Concurrent work, as described in the paper: OpenAI announced on 6 Oct two better-than-2 k-median algorithms, an optimal (1 + 2/e + ε)-approximation extending Byrka et al.’s iterative rounding and a (2 − σ)-approximation; a group around Byrka and Shi Li independently reached 2 − σ. These OpenAI claims were not checked here

What happened

The greedy algorithm of Jain, Mahdian, Markakis, Saberi and Vazirani (2002–03) has been the engine behind the best k-median guarantees through its 2-LMP guarantee for facility location. A 2023 local-search analysis improved it by only about 2.25 × 10⁻⁷. In arXiv 2610.181441 (13 Oct 2026), a team from EPFL, Google Research, CMU and NYU changes the algorithm itself: clients bid with general functions of their budget and distance instead of the classical linear bid. The bid [α − 1.224 d]+ gives a 1.9499-LMP guarantee, which they make “log-adaptive” to get a polynomial-time 1.95-approximation opening k + O(log n) centers. With a (1.89 + ε) algorithm for stable instances from the companion Part II, this gives a better-than-2 approximation for k-median.

The paper separates human and AI work. The main proofs “were developed solely by the authors without the use of AI”. In Remark 1.5, GPT-6 Astra found a 13-term bidding function with LMP ratio 1.844, and proved that no admissible bidding function can push this factor-revealing program below 1.8. Lean certificates for both, and for the paper’s Theorem 4.4, “were obtained by GPT-6 Astra” and are on GitHub.

The authors also note concurrent work. OpenAI announced on 6 Oct two better-than-2 k-median algorithms, including an optimal (1 + 2/e + ε)-approximation, and a group around Jarosław Byrka and Shi Li independently reached 2 − σ. Those claims were not checked for this entry.

Why it matters

Factor 2 was a well-known barrier in clustering approximation. Here it falls to human work in the same weeks as OpenAI’s claimed AI-found algorithms. The AI’s own contribution is typical of the stronger 2026 collaborations: it tuned the construction further and proved where the method stops, with machine-checkable certificates.

What is disputed or not yet verified

What is disputed or not yet verified
VerificationUnrefereed preprint; Lean certificates for the AI-found bounds and for Theorem 4.4

Sources

2 sources from 2 sites. Numbers match the chips in the text.

2 sources: 2 primary

Primary

  1. arXiv 2610.18144: A Better-than-2 Approximation for k-Median Part I: The Power of General Bidsarxiv.org, paper
  2. GitHub: epfl-thl2/project-k-median (Lean certificates)github.com, code

Changes

  • Filed from the arXiv paper

Status

Claim

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Lean-verified
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
14 October 2026

Sources at a glance

2 sources: 2 primary

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
14 October 2026
Sources read
The arXiv paper
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Last saved 14 October 2026

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

Related events

  1. Science & math

    Mid-October 2026: arXiv results with disclosed AI help

    Awaiting review

  2. Science & math

    OpenAI releases 722 AI-written math manuscripts claiming hundreds of open problems

    Event confirmedAwaiting review