k-median breaks the factor-2 barrier
EPFL-led team gives a 1.95-LMP algorithm; GPT-6 Astra pushes it to 1.844 and proves a 1.8 limit, both with Lean certificates
Event confirmedAwaiting review
The takeaway
A human-proved 1.95-LMP algorithm, with a companion paper, gives a better-than-2 approximation for metric k-median. GPT-6 Astra improved the ratio of the same method to 1.844 and proved the method cannot go below 1.8, with Lean certificates. The paper says OpenAI announced other better-than-2 algorithms on 6 Oct.
Status
- Claim
Event confirmedAwaiting review
- Our reporting
- High confidence
- Verification
- Lean-verified
- Importance
- 3 of 5
- Last verified
- 14 October 2026
Your AI and this story
- GPT-6 Astra166 days after its cutoff
- Claude Opus 5.5105 days after its cutoff
- Gemini 4 Argon196 days after its cutoff
- Grok 4.7135 days after its cutoff
None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 105 days before it.
Key facts
- Paper: arXiv 2610.18144 [cs.DS], 13 Oct 2026; authors at EPFL, Google Research, Carnegie Mellon and NYU (incl. Ola Svensson, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Anupam Gupta)
- Main result: a polynomial-time 1.95-LMP (Lagrangian-multiplier-preserving) approximation for facility location using the bid β(α, d) = [α − 1.224 d]+; the previous best LMP factor was 2 − η with η ≈ 2.25 × 10⁻⁷ (Cohen-Addad, Grandoni, Lee, Schwiegelshohn)
- k-median: a 1.95-approximation opening k + O(log n) centers; with a (1.89 + ε)-approximation for stable instances in the companion Part II, this gives a better-than-2 polynomial-time approximation. Prior state: (2 + ε) (Cohen-Addad et al. 2025; Byrka et al. 2026); k-median is hard to approximate below 1 + 2/e
- GPT-6 Astra (Remark 1.5): ‘GPT-6 Astra managed to improve the LMP approximation ratio to 1.844’, with a 13-term bidding function, and ‘managed to prove that for any admissible bidding function … the supremum of the factor revealing program … has value at least 1.8’, so the approach cannot go below 1.8
- AI statement: ‘The mathematical proofs presented in this work (apart from Remark 1.5) were developed solely by the authors without the use of AI.’ GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Astra were used for proof-checking and writing help; ‘The lean certificates mentioned in Remark 1.5 and the certificate for Theorem 4.4 were obtained by GPT-6 Astra’
- Lean certificates: github.com/epfl-thl2/project-k-median (reachable on 14 Oct 2026)
- Concurrent work, as described in the paper: OpenAI announced on 6 Oct two better-than-2 k-median algorithms, an optimal (1 + 2/e + ε)-approximation extending Byrka et al.’s iterative rounding and a (2 − σ)-approximation; a group around Byrka and Shi Li independently reached 2 − σ. These OpenAI claims were not checked here
What happened
The greedy algorithm of Jain, Mahdian, Markakis, Saberi and Vazirani (2002–03) has been the engine behind the best k-median guarantees through its 2-LMP guarantee for facility location. A 2023 local-search analysis improved it by only about 2.25 × 10⁻⁷. In arXiv 2610.181441 (13 Oct 2026), a team from EPFL, Google Research, CMU and NYU changes the algorithm itself: clients bid with general functions of their budget and distance instead of the classical linear bid. The bid [α − 1.224 d]+ gives a 1.9499-LMP guarantee, which they make “log-adaptive” to get a polynomial-time 1.95-approximation opening k + O(log n) centers. With a (1.89 + ε) algorithm for stable instances from the companion Part II, this gives a better-than-2 approximation for k-median.
The paper separates human and AI work. The main proofs “were developed solely by the authors without the use of AI”. In Remark 1.5, GPT-6 Astra found a 13-term bidding function with LMP ratio 1.844, and proved that no admissible bidding function can push this factor-revealing program below 1.8. Lean certificates for both, and for the paper’s Theorem 4.4, “were obtained by GPT-6 Astra” and are on GitHub.
The authors also note concurrent work. OpenAI announced on 6 Oct two better-than-2 k-median algorithms, including an optimal (1 + 2/e + ε)-approximation, and a group around Jarosław Byrka and Shi Li independently reached 2 − σ. Those claims were not checked for this entry.
Why it matters
Factor 2 was a well-known barrier in clustering approximation. Here it falls to human work in the same weeks as OpenAI’s claimed AI-found algorithms. The AI’s own contribution is typical of the stronger 2026 collaborations: it tuned the construction further and proved where the method stops, with machine-checkable certificates.
What is disputed or not yet verified
| Verification | Unrefereed preprint; Lean certificates for the AI-found bounds and for Theorem 4.4 |
|---|
Sources
2 sources from 2 sites. Numbers match the chips in the text.
2 sources: 2 primary
Primary
Changes
- Filed from the arXiv paper