Post-Cutoff

Science & mathOpenAI, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ohio State University108 days after June 2026

Lonely runner: (1+c)/2n bound with ChatGPT 6

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Importance: major (4 of 5)

The takeaway

A human-led result on the 1967 lonely runner problem in which ChatGPT 6 Pro proposed the GCD-sum route, pointed to Green–Walker and fixed gaps, but ‘the models were unable to improve the lonely runner bound on their own’.

Status
Claim

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Preprint only
Importance
Major (4 of 5)
Last verified
19 October 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 Astra169 days after its cutoff
  • Claude Opus 5.5108 days after its cutoff
  • Gemini 4 Argon199 days after its cutoff
  • Grok 4.7138 days after its cutoff

None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 108 days before it.

Key facts

  • Paper: Xiyu Hu and Yifan Jing, ‘Near optimal gap in the Lonely Runner Conjecture’, arXiv 2610.23790 [math.NT], submitted 16 Oct 2026, 24 pp.
  • Theorem 1.1: there is an absolute c > 0 such that ML(V) > (1+c)/(2n) for every set V of n ≥ 2 distinct positive integers; in fact the set of good times has measure at least an absolute κ0, and c = κ0/2
  • Previous bounds (paper): Tao, 1/(2n) + c·log n/(n²(log log n)²); Bedert (2025), 1/(2n) + n^(−5/3−o(1)); Bedert, communicated, n^(−3/2−o(1)). ‘All these bounds still give a relative improvement tending to zero’
  • Corollary: a lower bound P(ε) ≥ (1+c)/(2ε) for the rotation-and-dilation pyjama problem (Kravitz–Leng equivalence)
  • Method: a refinement of Green and Walker’s large-GCD argument plus a new ‘physical spillover inequality’ for interval multiplicities (Proposition 4.4)
  • AI statement: ‘The main strategy and mathematical framework of the paper were developed by the authors. ChatGPT 6 Astra and ChatGPT 6 Pro were used primarily to verify arguments, turn preliminary or informal proofs into rigorous proofs, and explore possible refinements… the models were unable to improve the lonely runner bound on their own’
  • AI contributions named: ‘ChatGPT 6 Pro suggested introducing suitable GCD sum estimates’; ‘the AI tools pointed the authors toward the Green–Walker refinement’; ‘Some small gaps in the first version of his proof were later fixed by ChatGPT 6 Pro’; ChatGPT 6 Pro ‘assisted the second author in refining the Green–Walker argument’; Astra used for language polishing
  • No Hacker News thread or high-reach X post found on 19 Oct morning

What happened

In the lonely runner problem, n+1 runners with distinct constant speeds start together on a unit circular track. The conjecture says each runner is at some moment at least 1/(n+1) away from all the others. Equivalently, for n speeds there is a time t when every v·t is at least 1/(n+1) from the nearest integer. A simple union bound gives 1/(2n), and decades of work had only added lower-order terms.

Hu and Jing push the bound to (1+c)/(2n). Their AI statement gives an unusually detailed history: Hu’s partial results under modularity conditions, ChatGPT 6 Pro’s suggestion of GCD sums to combine information across primes, the models pointing to Green–Walker, Jing’s spillover inequality (with small gaps fixed by ChatGPT 6 Pro), and a strengthened Green–Walker theorem worked out with the model. “These discussions did not produce any uniform results” until the human spillover idea arrived.

Why it matters

It is a substantial result on a well-known problem, and its disclosure is a clear record of the division of labour. The models acted as a knowledgeable collaborator that supplies tools and fixes proofs, while the decisive idea came from the humans. The authors put it as “an interesting example of the importance of human mathematician input”.

What is disputed or not yet verified

What is disputed or not yet verified
VerificationUnrefereed arXiv preprint

Sources

3 sources from 2 sites. Numbers match the chips in the text.

3 sources: 2 primary, 1 reaction

Primary

  1. arXiv 2610.23790: Near optimal gap in the Lonely Runner Conjecture (Hu, Jing)arxiv.org, paper
  2. Bedert, Riesz products and the Lonely Runner Conjecture (arXiv 2511.16636, prior bound)arxiv.org, paper

Reactions

  1. Wikipedia: Lonely runner conjectureen.wikipedia.org, discussion

Changes

  • Filed (PDF read)

Status

Claim

Event confirmedAwaiting review

Our reporting
High confidence
Verification
Preprint only
Importance
Major (4 of 5)
Last verified
19 October 2026

Sources at a glance

3 sources: 2 primary, 1 reaction

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
19 October 2026
Sources read
PDF read
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Changed since the last daily snapshot

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

Related events

  1. Science & math

    AI-assisted results in the 19 Oct 2026 arXiv listing

    Awaiting review