Post-Cutoff

ResearchAnthropic125 days after June 2026

Anthropic open-sources FlashProve, a zero-knowledge prototype that proves a response came from committed model weights

Confirmed

The takeaway

On Nov 2, 2026 (X announcement Nov 3) Anthropic published FlashProve, an Apache-2.0 zkSNARK prototype that lets a verifier check that a model’s output came from a specific committed set of weights without seeing them.

Status
Claim

Confirmed

Our reporting
High confidence
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
4 November 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 Astra186 days after its cutoff
  • Claude Opus 5.5125 days after its cutoff
  • Gemini 4 Argon216 days after its cutoff
  • Grok 4.7155 days after its cutoff

None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 125 days before it.

Key facts

  • Model tested: Llama 4 Maverick (400B MoE, ~17B active), third-party 4-bit conversion
  • Proving ~110 tokens/s on one H100; proof ~19 MB per 1,024-token request; verification ~17 s on a 24-thread CPU
  • Overhead: roughly 70–95x the GPU time of serving the model on vLLM
  • Protocol properties (completeness, soundness, zero knowledge) proven in Lean; the fast C++ verifier is not formally verified
  • Limits: integer model under greedy decoding only, 1,024-token context, architecture not hidden, side channels out of scope
  • Anthropic’s X post: 462k views (fxtwitter, Nov 4)

What happened

Anthropic’s research page describes FlashProve as “an open-source performant prototype for provable inference.” The provider publishes a commitment to its weights once; afterwards it produces proofs for batches of requests, and anyone holding the commitment can check them without the weights. Anthropic’s X post names two uses: making it harder to hijack a chat, and letting safety evaluators confirm that the model they tested is the one served to customers.

Why it matters

Evaluators and governments have had no way to check that the deployed model is the audited one. The prototype is far from production cost (70–95x GPU time, short contexts, greedy decoding only), and Anthropic presents it as research, not a product.

Sources

4 sources from 4 sites. Numbers match the chips in the text.

4 sources: 3 primary, 1 press

Primary

  1. Anthropic: Provable inference (FlashProve)anthropic.com, official
  2. FlashProve code (GitHub, Apache 2.0)github.com, code
  3. Anthropic on X (Nov 3)x.com, official

Press

  1. TechCrunch: Anthropic is working on a system to prove AI models’ identitytechcrunch.com, press

Changes

  • Filed

Status

Claim

Confirmed

Our reporting
High confidence
Importance
3 of 5
Last verified
4 November 2026

Sources at a glance

4 sources: 3 primary, 1 press

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
4 November 2026
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Last saved 4 November 2026

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

On “Should we be worried?”

  • Response Activation probes now monitor production models (Goodfire caught 94% of hacking sessions in a test; OpenAI since GPT-5.6); Anthropic’s FlashProve prototype proves which weights produced a reply.In Deception, sabotage and gaming evaluations

Posts we archived

The whole topic