Post-Cutoff

Science & mathOpenAI126 days after June 2026

FPRAS for mixed volumes, ideas from GPT-6 Astra

Awaiting review

Importance: major (4 of 5)
Status
Claim

Awaiting review

Our reporting
Medium confidence
Verification
Preprint only
Importance
Major (4 of 5)
Last verified
3 November 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 Astra187 days after its cutoff
  • Claude Opus 5.5126 days after its cutoff
  • Gemini 4 Argon217 days after its cutoff
  • Grok 4.7156 days after its cutoff

None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 126 days before it.

Key facts

  • Claim: first FPRAS for mixed volumes of arbitrary compact convex sets given by weak membership oracles; ‘This disproves a longstanding conjecture of Gurvits [Gur09a, Section 4, item 2]’
  • AI disclosure (verbatim): ‘The main ideas were generated entirely by GPT 6 Astra. The purpose of this paper is to provide a human-written exposition of the algorithm.’
  • Running time: GPT-6 Astra estimated about n^900 ε^-220 · poly(L); the authors say they have not verified it and ‘do not claim it as a proved bound’
  • Verification status: unrefereed preprint, rewritten and checked by the authors; no formalization

What happened

Chen and Liu posted an algorithm that approximates mixed volumes to any relative accuracy in randomized polynomial time. They credit the main ideas entirely to GPT-6 Astra and present the paper as their human-written exposition. The polynomial is very large (an unverified model estimate puts it near n^900).

Why it matters

Mixed volumes generalize permanents and volumes; Gurvits had conjectured that no such scheme exists. The result is theoretical, and refereeing has not started.

What is disputed or not yet verified

What is disputed or not yet verified
VerificationPreprint, author-checked

Sources

1 source from 1 site. Numbers match the chips in the text.

1 source: 1 primary

Primary

  1. arXiv 2611.01368: An FPRAS for Mixed Volumes (Chen, Liu)arxiv.org, paper

Changes

  • Filed

Status

Claim

Awaiting review

Our reporting
Medium confidence
Verification
Preprint only
Importance
Major (4 of 5)
Last verified
3 November 2026

Sources at a glance

1 source: 1 primary

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
3 November 2026
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Last saved 3 November 2026

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

Related events

  1. Science & math

    AI-assisted results, 3 Nov: arXiv of 3 Nov and Hexagon of 2–3 Nov

    Awaiting review

The whole topic