AI-assisted results, 8 Nov: Hexagon of 7 Nov and arXiv
Awaiting review
The takeaway
The 8 Nov sweep listed 22 uncited Hexagon works of 7 Nov and 352 arXiv papers mentioning AI. Own entries: 2×2 matrix mortality undecidable, the quasiplanar conjecture proved by ChatGPT-6, D-equivalence for generalized Kummer type, and Anthropic’s two Claude physics papers.
Status
- Claim
Awaiting review
- Our reporting
- Medium confidence
- Verification
- Lean-verified
- Importance
- 2 of 5
- Last verified
- 8 November 2026
Your AI and this story
- GPT-6 Astra192 days after its cutoff
- Claude Opus 5.5131 days after its cutoff
- Gemini 4 Argon222 days after its cutoff
- Grok 4.7161 days after its cutoff
None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 131 days before it.
Key facts
- Own entries: 2×2 matrix mortality claimed undecidable (AI-assisted, Lean) (arXiv 2611.06562), Quasiplanar graph conjecture proved by ChatGPT-6 (Pach, Tardos, Zeng) (2611.07314), D-equivalence for generalized Kummer hyperkählers (ChatGPT-6 assisted) (2611.04118), Anthropic’s Claude physics papers: Hawking–Page and modular bootstrap (Hexagon 2611.00175, 2611.00174)
- Qiyue Tang (Tsinghua), GPT-6-Pro sessions of 2–10 hours reviewed by Codex, ‘some’ human understanding, Rethlas-OSV review ‘planned’: the multiplication part of Lusztig’s positivity conjecture for symmetric Cartan data (2611.00190, a 5 h 46 min session; would be a major result, no expert check); the Lu–Wenzel conjecture (2611.00179); disproof of Xi’s conjecture on representation dimension of idempotent corners (2611.00137, ‘passed the Rethlas-OSV review’); Conjecture 5.5 of Armstrong-Williams–Hirst–Jackson–Lee (2611.00181); counterexamples to Reading–Stella source–sink recursions (2611.00186); NP/RE-completeness of mutation equivalence (2611.00180); singleton dominance regions (2611.00185)
- Gasull’s problem on globally periodic rational difference equations answered yes at every order (was known for k ∈ {1,2,3,4,5,7,9,11}); John Rudge (Cambridge Earth Sciences) with Claude Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1, Lean-formalized: ‘almost entirely AI-generated … Human input was mostly limited to encouragement (“keep going” etc)’; ‘I understand the statement … but not the details’ (2611.00183)
- Foregger’s conjecture (per A ≥ 2^{1−n} for nearly decomposable doubly stochastic matrices) claimed by Yair Lavi with GPT Sol, GPT Astra and Claude Fable; mixed text, all parts human-checked (2611.00169)
- L’vov–Kaplansky conjecture, partial cases: standard polynomials in every degree, Y. T. Miah with GPT-6 Pro, which ‘contributed substantially to developing the odd- and even-degree mathematical arguments’ (2611.00184); multilinear polynomials of degrees 4–6, Shengyong Pan (Beijing Jiaotong), declared human-written (2611.00173)
- Other Hexagon 7 Nov: Černý-type reset threshold cubic coefficient 8242/49923 (Shitov’s was 8257/49923), ‘primarily AI-generated’ by Codex, no human understanding (2611.00172, Sungbin Hong, U Tokyo); Subset Sum exponent 0.48758, Jennifer Voitle with Claude Opus 5.5, conditional on OpenAI’s and Kapila’s written proofs (2611.00178); four exponentials conjecture at CM and Beta periods and a Lean formalization of Waldschmidt’s subgroup theorem, Shawn Krisman, ‘done by Claude Opus 5.5’, no human check (2611.00171, 2611.00170); ‘orphan theorem’ for perpendicular billiard orbits in rational right triangles, Joshua Boorstein with Claude (2611.00191); two Grothendieck Montpellier-notes results in Lean, Michel Hua with Claude Opus 5/5.5 (2611.00189, 2611.00188); four-cycle supersaturation at q²+q vertices, Codex-revised (2611.00176); positive holomorphic sectional curvature of flag manifolds, alternative proof with ChatGPT, all human-checked (2611.00168)
- arXiv, AI credited with content: a second proof that dimension 6 has no four MUBs, by topology of complex Hadamard matrices; ‘ChatGPT 6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 assisted significantly in developing the proof’ (Wuttig, Tindall; 2611.06917; follows OpenAI’s family-266 claim); a fourth AI-assisted proof of the Courtade–Kumar conjecture, ‘obtained with interactive collaboration with GPT-6 Astra and DeepSeekV4.1-Flash’ (Kramer, Saglam; 2611.05430; see Courtade–Kumar ‘most informative Boolean function’ conjecture (2013) proved three times in two days, all with AI: Ky & Tran (ChatGPT), Google + CUHK (Gemini, Lean-verified end-to-end), Mahdavifar & Beirami); Behnezhad and Azarmehr break the 2-approximation barrier for sublinear metric TSP (sublinear.info problem 71), ChatGPT-6 Astra ‘played a substantial role in developing parts of the final algorithm’ (2611.04283); Kaplansky’s four group-ring conjectures fail for torsion-free hyperbolic groups in every positive characteristic, extending OpenAI’s constructions (Mghirbi, Douglas; 2611.04599); Fujita’s advanced generalised Mukai conjecture, single author, after reading OpenAI’s generalised Mukai proof with ChatGPT 6 (Duo Li; 2611.05452); Tarun Grover extends OpenAI’s Haldane gap proof to higher dimensions with ChatGPT Astra and Codex (2611.07400)
- arXiv, AI found key steps: ‘Theorem 1.2 was resolved using GPT-6 Astra with Xean in 13 hours’ (all minimum cuts of symmetric submodular functions, 2611.08253); quickest transshipment result ‘obtained by using GPT-6 Astra’ (2611.07369); robust streaming clustering developed with GPT Astra (2611.07678); Runge–Kutta order barrier and SSP bound, ‘AI-assisted proofs’ (Gottlieb et al., IBM; 2611.07981); 29-point counterexample to the happy edge conjecture found with ChatGPT-Sol 6.1 (2611.05300); Douglas’ conjecture for m-Kronecker quivers with Astra and Fable in Lean (2611.04862); VOA library in Lean with Claude and Codex (2611.06616); Monodromy computation model, AI ‘contributed substantially to the conception’ (2611.04377); Claude Code pipeline refuting 162,964 and proving 117,390 spectral-graph conjectures, 79,505 Lean-verified (2611.03879); Bergeron’s two diagonal-harmonics conjectures with ChatGPT (2611.00629); hypercube noise stability of order 7/8 with GPT-6 Astra (2611.00868); log-concavity criterion with Claude, Codex and GPT-6 Pro (2611.01561); Katok periodic-point counterexamples, GPT-6 for construction details (2611.01980); weighted convolution counterexample, ChatGPT strategies for Theorem 1.2 (2611.03334); parity decision trees with GPT Astra (2611.03452); non-pseudo-arithmetic hyperbolic 4-manifolds with Codex (2611.05795)
Show 4 more
- arXiv, smaller AI steps: proofs written up by GPT-6 Astra from sketches (2611.07661); ChatGPT 6.1 Sol first draft of §3.2.2 (2611.08429); Claude for drafting and checking proofs (2611.08404); GPT-6 contributed Remark 1.25 (2611.07365); ChatGPT for some proof development (2611.07460); ChatGPT Pro suggested a key connection (2611.07336); proof strategy debugged with GPT-6 Sol, Astra and Claude (2611.08356); ideas developed with ChatGPT for relativistic Vlasov–Poisson (2611.01004); Gyárfás–Sumner polylogarithmic bound is the authors’ own, Astra Pro only simplified (2611.06699). The rest of the 352 mention AI only for editing, literature, code or figures, or are about AI
- Conjecture papers without AI disclosure (65 listed; ~60 uncited): no famous problem with an AI angle
- Repos: google-deepmind/formal-conjectures commits of 6 Nov add statements only (98 OEIS files; Green’s Open Problems 68, 70, 75, 87, 93, 97; Erdős 651, 1164, 1166)
- Hexagon backlog (8 lines): Deep Bhattacharjee with Claude Code, refutes Brešar et al.’s Conjecture 22 on Grundy domination (2610.00494) and finds his own Geometric Selection Conjecture ‘cannot be closed as stated’ (2610.00493); Patrick Lopatto, largest gaps of the GOE, ‘Proof discovery, verification, and writing were done with GPT 6 Astra, GPT 6.1 Sol, and Claude Opus 5.5’ (2610.00491); twisted Haagerup–Izumi VOAs, not fully human-verified (2610.00490); Parthasarathy rank bound tightness, Kimi K3 and Gemini for structuring (2610.00489); Möbius circles of eta terms (2610.00487); heat-evolved Weyl polynomials, no human check (2610.00486); Turán power-sum constant C_42 ≤ 0.6888863712 by AI agents (2610.00485)
What happened
Daily catalogue; see key facts. The Lusztig positivity claim (2611.00190) would be notable if it holds, but it comes from a contributor who posts many fast GPT-6-Pro results with “some” human understanding and no expert review. It stays here until someone checks it.
What is disputed or not yet verified
| Verification | Unrefereed preprints and Hexagon deposits |
|---|
Sources
61 sources from 3 sites. Numbers match the chips in the text.
61 sources: 61 primary
Primary
- Hexagon 2611.00191hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00190hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00189hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00188hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00186hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00185hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00184hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00183hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00181hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00180hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00179hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00178hexagonmath.org, paper
Show all 61 sources
- Hexagon 2611.00176hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00137hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00173hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00172hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00171hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00170hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00169hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00168hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00494hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00493hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00491hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00490hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00489hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00487hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00486hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00485hexagonmath.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.06917arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.05430arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.05452arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.04283arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.04599arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.07400arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.07369arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.07678arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.08253arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.07981arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.05300arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.04862arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.06616arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.04377arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.03879arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.06699arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.07567arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.08429arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.08404arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.00629arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.00868arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.01561arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.01980arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.03334arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.03452arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.05795arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.07661arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.08356arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.07365arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.07460arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.07336arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.01004arxiv.org, paper
- google-deepmind/formal-conjectures commit (6 Nov, Erdős 1164)github.com, code
Changes
- Filed (science agent; arXiv; Hexagon backlog lines 2610.00485–00494)