Post-Cutoff

Science & mathMIT, University of Waterloo and OpenAI133 days after June 2026

Graphic TSP below 7/5 (89/64), GPT-5.6 Pro and GPT-6 Astra

Awaiting review

Importance: major (4 of 5)

The takeaway

Since 2012 the best ratio for graphic TSP relative to the subtour LP was Sebő and Vygen’s 7/5. A new preprint gets 89/64 and so bounds the integrality gap on graphic instances by about 1.3906; the authors say OpenAI models helped with the final counting in one section and with the parameter choices that give the bound.

Status
Claim

Awaiting review

Our reporting
Medium confidence
Verification
Preprint only
Importance
Major (4 of 5)
Last verified
14 November 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 Astra194 days after its cutoff
  • Claude Opus 5.5133 days after its cutoff
  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen224 days after its cutoff
  • Grok 4.7163 days after its cutoff

None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 133 days before it.

Key facts

  • Method (abstract): optimise a non-linear objective over an odd-join polytope, using a new removable system of edges and reconnection of subtours
  • AI methodology (verbatim excerpts): ‘The counting arguments and computations leading to the final bound on paid increases in Section G were developed by the authors with assistance from OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Pro.’ ‘GPT-6 Astra assisted in refining the choice of the increase parameters d and deriving the bounds obtained from convex combinations of these points in Appendix I.’ ‘AI tools also assisted with checking and simplifying proofs, as well as developing Lean formalizations.’ The StarDeletionLP/StarReconnectionLP frameworks and the constructions are credited to the authors
  • Status: unrefereed preprint; the scope of the Lean work is not detailed in the statement; no expert reaction found by 14 Nov

What happened

Three optimisation researchers posted an approximation algorithm for the traveling salesman problem on graph metrics (graphic TSP) whose tours are within 89/64 of the subtour LP bound, below the 7/5 that Sebő and Vygen reached in 2012. The paper’s AI methodology section separates the authors’ frameworks and constructions from the parts where GPT-5.6 Pro and GPT-6 Astra helped: the final counting in Section G and the parameter tuning in Appendix I.

Why it matters

Graphic TSP is a standard testbed for the 4/3 integrality-gap conjecture, and progress on its ratio has been rare since the early 2010s. The disclosure is precise about which steps involved models. Not yet refereed.

What is disputed or not yet verified

What is disputed or not yet verified
VerificationPreprint, unrefereed

Sources

1 source from 1 site. Numbers match the chips in the text.

1 source: 1 primary

Primary

  1. arXiv 2611.13585: Approximating graphic TSP by b-matchings (Gupta, Sohrabi, Tunçel)arxiv.org, paper

Changes

  • Filed (science agent)

Status

Claim

Awaiting review

Our reporting
Medium confidence
Verification
Preprint only
Importance
Major (4 of 5)
Last verified
14 November 2026

Sources at a glance

1 source: 1 primary

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
14 November 2026
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Changed since the last daily snapshot

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

Related events

  1. Science & math

    AI-assisted results, 14 Nov

    Awaiting review

The whole topic