Post-Cutoff

Kevin Buzzard: ‘To grieve, or not to grieve?’

Kevin BuzzardBlog

Why it matters

Long essay by the leader of the Lean Fermat’s Last Theorem project on how mathematicians should respond to AI proofs; listed by Tao on Oct 12.

Summary

Posted Oct 1, 2026 on the Xena Project blog (Tao’s list attributes it to Kevin Buzzard). Summary from an automated reading of the first 100,000 of about 111,000 characters: the field ‘is currently undergoing a rapid transformation, unlike anything that we have ever seen before’. Buzzard separates theorem-proving, theory-building and conjecture-making and says machines are currently strong only at the first; he writes ‘I’m in it for the theorem tally’ and ‘I am an optimist, so I am expecting future machines to be awesome’, and argues that ‘mathematics is infinite’. He asks AI labs to publish their results and treats Lean formalization as a reliable source of truth. Mentions the Navier–Stokes claim, the Erdős unit-distance disproof, the AGMAI recommendations and two open letters to OpenAI. Quotes were extracted by a summarising tool and should be re-checked against the page.

Archived text

We have not archived the text of this post yet.

Source: xenaproject.wordpress.com/2026/10/01/to-grieve-or-not-to-grieve

Cited in

  1. Science & math 98 days after the cutoff

    OpenAI releases 722 AI-written math manuscripts claiming hundreds of open problems

  2. Science & math 70 days after the cutoff

    OpenAI claims a Millennium Prize problem

People in this post

Terence Tao, Professor of mathematics, UCLA