Nick Cammarata announces ‘Neural Networks Are Already Clean’: ‘ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most’
Nick Cammarata @nickcammarataX
Why it matters
Announcement of Goodfire’s essay by a co-founder of circuits-style interpretability; ~1.11M views and ~10.2k likes on day one (fxtwitter).
Summary
Cammarata says interpretability “might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now”. He writes that early mechanistic interpretability work at OpenAI left him pessimistic, and that OpenAI’s first large-scale automated interpretability project, which he started, found “about 2% of neurons legible”. With “modern agentic tools” he now finds “the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible”. He says “many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood” and that he now thinks “ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon”. Reach on Oct 15 via api.fxtwitter.com: ~1,110k views, ~10.2k likes, ~1.36k reposts, ~808 quotes.
Archived text
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don’t think we can solve alignment if we don’t know what we’re building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai’s first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had
with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren’t there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works