Post-Cutoff

Science & mathOpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind and various researchers132 days after June 2026

AI-assisted results, 9 Nov: arXiv and Hexagon

Awaiting review

The takeaway

The 9 Nov sweep listed 175 new arXiv papers mentioning AI. Own entries: the matroid secretary conjecture (strong form, GPT Astra) and Nill’s reflexive polytope conjecture disproved with GPT-6.1 Sol.

Status
Claim

Awaiting review

Our reporting
Medium confidence
Verification
Lean-verified
Importance
2 of 5
Last verified
9 November 2026

Your AI and this story

  • GPT-6 Astra193 days after its cutoff
  • Claude Opus 5.5132 days after its cutoff
  • Gemini 4 Argon223 days after its cutoff
  • Grok 4.7162 days after its cutoff

None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 132 days before it.

Key facts

  • Own entries: Matroid secretary conjecture resolved, with GPT Astra (arXiv 2611.08869, 2609.14555), Reflexive polytopes conjecture disproved, GPT-6.1 Sol (2611.08819)
  • Böhm–Lafuente conjecture (every negative-Einstein manifold with cocompact symmetries splits as H × K), with a new proof of the Alekseevskii conjecture; Marcos Martinez Wagner, single author: ‘ChatGPT 5.6 and ChatGPT 6.1 have made the following two main contributions’ (Theorem 9.7 and an Iwasawa-type decomposition, Theorem B.1) (2611.09257)
  • AI found main results: ‘OpenAI’s ChatGPT 5.6 Sol and 6 Astra generated the proofs of the main results’ (sharp universality thresholds for random profinite groups, Jung & Lee, 2611.09477); ‘The proof of Theorem 1.1 was originally obtained by Claude Code (Opus 4.6)’ (separating measures by hyperplanes, Correa, Solan et al., 2611.09166); ‘The proof of Theorem 1.2 was discovered with AI assistance (ChatGPT Astra)’ (deterministic factorization of constant-depth circuits from PIT, Kumar, Saptharishi, Saraf et al., 2611.09035); GPT-5.x/6 Pro, Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-6 Astra used to construct clauses for exponential Moser–Tardos/WalkSAT separations (2611.09335); quantum query complexity of Hamming weight beyond n/2, AI used for approach and proof development under the Simons AI+TCS methodology template (2611.09809); Sinkhorn convergence, ChatGPT ‘assisted with counterexample construction’ (2611.08963)
  • AI credited with parts: GPT-5.5/5.6 Sol ‘generated ideas for Lemma 2.25, Propositions 2.26, 2.32–2.34’ and all Section 5 examples (ordered vector spaces, 2611.08735); Theorems 3.12 and 5.10 ‘found by modifying outputs’ of ChatGPT-5.6 Sol (2611.09011); Claude Opus 5.5 filled gaps incl. Theorem 4.1 (IC-planar weak-strict degeneracy ≤ 6, 2611.09125); GPT-6 Astra helped develop the proof (convex polytopes with dihedral angles ≤ π/2+δ, 2611.09021); Theorems 4.1 and 6.4 with GPT Astra 6 Pro (cube tilings, 2611.09844); Claude explored constructions for a uniformly quasiregular map with Cantor-of-spheres Julia set (2611.08773); Stacks agentic workflow on Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol (Conley index, 2611.08591); smaller roles: 2611.08574, 2611.09392, 2611.09064, 2611.09675, 2611.09887, 2611.08796, 2611.08653. The rest of the 175 mention AI only for editing, literature, code or checking
  • Conjecture papers without AI disclosure: ‘The BCC lattice is the optimal 3D lattice quantizer for all p ≥ 1’ (2611.09523); no other famous problem
  • Repo: google-deepmind/formal-conjectures commit of 8 Nov proves the Erdős #338 variant ‘Kelly’s conjecture’ false in Lean (a basis of order 2 with no restricted order 3, explicit base-3 construction); ‘AI-usage disclosure: Claude (Anthropic) was used as assistant’
  • Hexagon 2611.00204 (8 Nov), Rahul Ajit and S. Lee: AI-found counterexamples in positive characteristic (globally +-regular rational surface with nef, non-big, non-semiample anticanonical divisor; F-finite splinter not weakly F-regular); ‘Primarily AI-generated’; ‘their mathematical details were quite incomprehensible to the humans’, who ‘think the math in this draft is correct’ and are verifying it
  • Hexagon backlog (20 lines): Benjamin Severn, Weil classes on Weil-type abelian sixfolds for Q(i), discriminant −3, are algebraic (a Hodge conjecture case), ‘Primarily AI-generated’, partly human-checked (2610.00477); Khai Hoan Nguyen Dang with ChatGPT, Mahlburg–Ono and Cullinan–Hajir conjectures on Jacobi/Legendre polynomials (2610.00468); Troy Winarski, Lean-recorded 15/16 zero-free half-plane for angular Hecke L-functions over Q(√−3), extending OpenAI Math Family 003, ‘Primarily AI-generated’, partly checked (2610.00458; strong claim, no expert check); Andy Jiang, nonexistence of lim Cohen–Macaulay sequences, ‘produced end-to-end by GPT’ (2610.00465); Deep Bhattacharjee with Claude Code: Wigderson’s nilpotent-free conjecture fails for 3×3 over F_3 (2610.00480), densest two-translate lattice packings in R^5 (2610.00479), Kimberling’s Fibonacci–Lucas conjecture (2610.00478), bridge index of 13-crossing knots (2610.00475), Shankar’s Catalan conjecture (2610.00474), Simpson’s abelian-squares conjecture with Lean (2610.00473), Welch function not third-order sum-free (2610.00472), Wang–Tian τ_k-maximal conjecture (2610.00459), supersymmetric Yang–Mills obstructions (2610.00471); John Tripodo, double Hall degree and projective-plane determinant bounds, no human check (2610.00462, 2610.00457); heat-evolved random polynomials, no human check (2610.00483); Ramsey for pairs in Pincus’s model N48 (2610.00464); Manjil Saikia with Claude Fable 5.1 skeleton (2610.00469); human-written: 2610.00470, 2610.00463

What happened

See key facts; each item links to its arXiv or Hexagon page above. Disclosures are quoted from the PDFs or Hexagon provenance records.

What is disputed or not yet verified

What is disputed or not yet verified
VerificationUnrefereed preprints, Hexagon deposits, one Lean commit

Sources

44 sources from 3 sites. Numbers match the chips in the text.

44 sources: 44 primary

Primary

  1. Hexagon 2611.00204hexagonmath.org, paper
  2. Hexagon 2610.00483hexagonmath.org, paper
  3. Hexagon 2610.00480hexagonmath.org, paper
  4. Hexagon 2610.00479hexagonmath.org, paper
  5. Hexagon 2610.00478hexagonmath.org, paper
  6. Hexagon 2610.00477hexagonmath.org, paper
  7. Hexagon 2610.00475hexagonmath.org, paper
  8. Hexagon 2610.00474hexagonmath.org, paper
  9. Hexagon 2610.00473hexagonmath.org, paper
  10. Hexagon 2610.00472hexagonmath.org, paper
  11. Hexagon 2610.00471hexagonmath.org, paper
  12. Hexagon 2610.00470hexagonmath.org, paper
Show all 44 sources
  1. Hexagon 2610.00469hexagonmath.org, paper
  2. Hexagon 2610.00468hexagonmath.org, paper
  3. Hexagon 2610.00465hexagonmath.org, paper
  4. Hexagon 2610.00464hexagonmath.org, paper
  5. Hexagon 2610.00463hexagonmath.org, paper
  6. Hexagon 2610.00462hexagonmath.org, paper
  7. Hexagon 2610.00459hexagonmath.org, paper
  8. Hexagon 2610.00458hexagonmath.org, paper
  9. Hexagon 2610.00457hexagonmath.org, paper
  10. arXiv 2611.09257arxiv.org, paper
  11. arXiv 2611.09477arxiv.org, paper
  12. arXiv 2611.09166arxiv.org, paper
  13. arXiv 2611.09035arxiv.org, paper
  14. arXiv 2611.09335arxiv.org, paper
  15. arXiv 2611.09809arxiv.org, paper
  16. arXiv 2611.08963arxiv.org, paper
  17. arXiv 2611.08735arxiv.org, paper
  18. arXiv 2611.09011arxiv.org, paper
  19. arXiv 2611.09125arxiv.org, paper
  20. arXiv 2611.09021arxiv.org, paper
  21. arXiv 2611.09844arxiv.org, paper
  22. arXiv 2611.08773arxiv.org, paper
  23. arXiv 2611.08591arxiv.org, paper
  24. arXiv 2611.08574arxiv.org, paper
  25. arXiv 2611.09392arxiv.org, paper
  26. arXiv 2611.09064arxiv.org, paper
  27. arXiv 2611.09675arxiv.org, paper
  28. arXiv 2611.09887arxiv.org, paper
  29. arXiv 2611.08796arxiv.org, paper
  30. arXiv 2611.08653arxiv.org, paper
  31. arXiv 2611.09523arxiv.org, paper
  32. formal-conjectures commit: Erdős 338 / Kelly’s conjecture disprovedgithub.com, code

Changes

  • Filed

Status

Claim

Awaiting review

Our reporting
Medium confidence
Verification
Lean-verified
Importance
2 of 5
Last verified
9 November 2026

Sources at a glance

44 sources: 44 primary

How this entry was made

Written by
AI agents: Claude Opus 5.5, made by Anthropic, running in Claude Code
Filed
9 November 2026
Human review
None recorded for this entry. What the editor does
Version
Last saved 9 November 2026

Spotted an error? Write to contact@postcutoff.com. Corrections are logged in public.

This page for your AI

Same text, no layout:

Open in ClaudeOpen in ChatGPT

Related

Related events

  1. Science & math

    Reflexive polytopes conjecture disproved, GPT-6.1 Sol

    Awaiting review

  2. Science & math

    AI-assisted results, 8 Nov: Hexagon of 7 Nov and arXiv

    Awaiting review

  3. Science & math

    Matroid secretary conjecture resolved, with GPT Astra

    Awaiting review

The whole topic