AI-assisted results, 10 Nov: arXiv and Hexagon
Awaiting review
The takeaway
Own entries today: X_ns+(121) (two AI proofs) and the Benjamini–Schramm p_c < p_u claims. Below: a catalogue of the rest, quoted from Hexagon provenance and arXiv PDFs; nothing here is refereed.
Status
- Claim
Awaiting review
- Our reporting
- Medium confidence
- Verification
- Lean-verified
- Importance
- 2 of 5
- Last verified
- 10 November 2026
Your AI and this story
- GPT-6 Astra194 days after its cutoff
- Claude Opus 5.5133 days after its cutoff
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen224 days after its cutoff
- Grok 4.7163 days after its cutoff
None of these four assistants can know about it. The closest, Claude Opus 5.5, stops 133 days before it.
Key facts
- Own entries: X_ns+(121): two AI-generated proofs in two days (2611.00231, 2611.00255, 2611.00234), Benjamini–Schramm p_c < p_u: OpenAI bond proof in Lean, Claude site form (2611.00251); Smale constant deposits 2611.00258 and 2611.00187 added to GPT-6 Astra autonomously disproves Smale’s mean value conjecture in Lean; Euler Part II (arXiv 2611.10211) to 2D Euler non-uniqueness without force claimed three times, all with AI; Dixmier Lean commit to Claude Fable 5 finds a counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture in dimension 3
- Pavel Etingof (MIT), Hexagon 2611.00226: a one-parameter family of 1024-dimensional complex Hopf algebras with fixed coalgebra and varying algebra structure, answering ‘negatively the finiteness question of Etingof and Gelaki’; ‘This text has been produced by ChatGPT at a request by Pavel Etingof. It was repeatedly checked by AI agents’; human understanding ‘some’
- Manor Mendel, Hexagon 2611.00209: metric cotype q inequality with scaling m = O(n^(1/2+1/q)) for Banach spaces of Rademacher cotype q; ‘The proofs in this paper were obtained by GPT~6 Astra … verifying the correctness of the proofs’ by the author; human understanding ‘all’
- James Milne, Hexagon 2611.00244 (human-written): ‘a report on two preprints of OpenAI, “Milne’s rationality conjecture for abelian varieties” and “The rational Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties”, placing them in context’
- Nicholas Nash, 2611.00196: deterministic adversary forcing (1−o(1)) n log₂ n comparisons on any sorting algorithm (previous 37/64); ‘Except for the abstract, the text is AI-generated using GPT 6 Astra’
- Yue Ma, 2611.00248: R(12,12) ≥ 1661 by extending the Mathon–Shearer colouring; Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code ‘designed and ran the searches’ (SAT with CaDiCaL), Lean 4 listed
- Claude-agent deposits with little or no human checking: holographic entropy inequalities lacking unscaled contraction proofs (2611.00252, ‘checked only by other instances of the same models’); Boshernitzan 1992 complete-periodicity conjecture for rational right triangles, two papers (2611.00250, 2611.00213); ten DSRG parameter sets excluded (2611.00230, Lean listed); interpolation lemma of OpenAI’s Landau–Siegel paper formalized (2611.00200)
- Other Hexagon 9–10 Nov: Cereceda’s 2007 conjecture for bipartite 2-degenerate graphs (Dave Goel, 2611.00260, ‘overwhelmingly by AI models’); Cazenave’s eigenvalue conjecture μ₂² ≥ 4λ₂+1 (2611.00232, Codex); Yair Lavi with GPT and Claude Fable: cubic-lattice dimer constant ℓ₃ ≥ 0.44477 (2611.00227), counterexamples to a Drury-conjecture inequality (2611.00198) and three more (2611.00197, 2611.00201, 2611.00225); Palcoux et al. fusion categories (2611.00233); Banica (2611.00221, ‘Written by Chat GPT, with help from Teo Banica’); Enomoto pretorsion theories (‘Sol proved almost all materials’, 2611.00207); Kominers, Fibonacci polynomials (2611.00212); Yampolsky, non-computable derivatives (2611.00243); Qiyue Tang, ten deposits on L’vov–Kaplansky, Lusztig, Laurent positivity and Markov numbers (2611.00195, 00205, 00206, 00210, 00216, 00218, 00219, 00238, 00239, 00194, 00192)
Show 6 more
- arXiv 10 Nov, AI found main results: ‘The proofs of all the new results in this paper were discovered by ChatGPT 6.1 Sol’ (vertex splitting and global rigidity, 2611.10919); ‘All mathematical statements and proofs were found by ChatGPT 6 Pro’ (Kronecker coefficients, 2611.11593); ‘The mathematical content of this paper was generated using ChatGPT 6 Astra’ (Hodge–Witt torsion, 2611.11269); ‘The main results of this paper were initially obtained by Claude Opus 5.5’ (magnetic Ginzburg–Landau vortices, 2611.11360); proof of main theorem ‘discovered using ChatGPT-6 Astra Max’ (permutation complexes, 2611.11362); counterexample ‘generated through discussions with ChatGPT 6 Astra’ (divisorial domain, 2611.11357); maximal curves ‘discovered through extensive searches’ with GPT-6 Astra (2611.11298); R∞ for Higman–Thompson groups, idea ‘suggested by ChatGPT 6 Astra’ (2611.11294); Glauber dynamics on G(n,d/n), main ideas with GPT-5.6/6.1 Sol (2611.12444); unipotent Specht modules with Claude (2611.10813); Weak λ-sets, first proof drafts by GPT-6 Astra (2611.11025)
- Repos: formal-conjectures commits of 9 Nov add formal proofs for Erdős 423, 1098, 1193, 427 solved statements and a formal proof link for the AME(7,d) classification (exists iff d ≥ 3); no new openai/math commits; mathcommunity/oai-math-revised reverted a BFSS SU(2) Lean package (#77)
- Hexagon backlog (8 lines): Masaki Oshikawa, RP² model correlations decay faster than any power, ‘The proof was entirely generated by ChatGPT 6 Astra’, then formalized (2610.00453); Aronow and Lopatto, superfluid stiffness of the dilute hard-sphere Bose gas, ‘Proof discovery and verification were done with GPT 6 Astra, GPT 6.1 Sol, and Claude Opus 5.5’ (2610.00450); Brian Nugent, point separation for K_X + mL, m ≥ n+2, conditional on inputs stated in the paper, ‘Produced by GPT-6.1 Sol’ (2610.00447); Jungang Chen with ChatGPT, counterexamples to Csikvári’s Conjecture 7.3 (2610.00433) and three conjectures of Ok (2610.00431); Qiyue Tang, weakly Gorenstein symmetry counterexamples (2610.00436); Kominers (2610.00451); Bhattacharjee, Kreuzer–Skarke descent (2610.00456)
- Provenance read for all Hexagon works listed here. Qiyue Tang’s deposits come from long GPT-6-Pro runs audited by Codex, e.g. L’vov–Kaplansky for large matrices from ‘ten GPT-6-Pro research runs with a combined scheduled duration of 62.5 hours’ (2611.00206); a Rethlas-OSV review is ‘planned’ for some. Steve Hubbard’s ternary Goldbach note: ‘main results are checked in Lean 4 with Mathlib’ (2611.00211). Primarily human-written: 2611.00228, 2611.00229; Anwesh Ray (2611.00202) used ChatGPT 6.1 Sol only to explore and correct
- formal-conjectures, other 9 Nov commits: new Lean statements (no proofs) of Pittel’s stable-matching conjectures (#7812, #7852), the Irving–Leather conjectures (#7818, drafted with Codex), a Fanelli–Moscardelli roommates threshold (#7853), Erdős 1132 and 1042; proofs of the Erdős 963 greedy bound and links to existing formal proofs for Erdős 835, 654 and AME(7,2); Erdős 143 part (i) marked solved from Koukoulopoulos–Lamzouri–Lichtman (arXiv 2502.09539, not AI). None is a new open-problem resolution
- Other conjecture papers of 10 Nov (23): PDFs scanned, none discloses AI use and none concerns a famous problem
What happened
The Hexagon flow kept rising: 65 new deposits on 9–10 Nov, most declared “Primarily AI-generated”. Well-known contributors now include Etingof, Mendel, Najman, Zureick-Brown and Milne (whose own deposit is a human-written report on OpenAI’s Hodge preprints). Many deposits state that results were checked only by other model instances; read each as a claim.
What is disputed or not yet verified
| Verification | Unrefereed preprints and Hexagon deposits; some Lean |
|---|
Sources
82 sources from 3 sites. Numbers match the chips in the text.
82 sources: 82 primary
Primary
- Hexagon 2611.00244hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00226hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00209hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00196hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00248hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00250hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00213hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00252hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00260hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00232hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00230hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00200hexagonmath.org, paper
Show all 82 sources
- Hexagon 2611.00207hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00233hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00221hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00227hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00198hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00243hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00212hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00215hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00254hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00206hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00195hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00210hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00216hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00245hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00208hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00259hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00237hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00228hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00236hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00253hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00256hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00257hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00246hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00220hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00217hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00211hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00214hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00202hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00229hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00241hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00240hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00239hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00238hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00249hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00235hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00199hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00201hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00197hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00203hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00205hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00194hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00192hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00219hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00218hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00224hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00223hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2611.00225hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00456hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00453hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00451hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00450hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00447hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00436hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00433hexagonmath.org, paper
- Hexagon 2610.00431hexagonmath.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.10919arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.11593arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.11025arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.11269arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.11360arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.11362arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.11357arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.11298arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.11294arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.12444arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.10813arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.09978arxiv.org, paper
- arXiv 2611.10283arxiv.org, paper
- formal-conjectures #7611: AME(7,d) classification formal proof linkgithub.com, code
- formal-conjectures #7668: Erdős 423, 1098, 1193, 427 solved statements provedgithub.com, code
Changes
- Filed (science agent; Hexagon API records and provenance, GitHub commit pages)