Artificial Analysis thread (reply 1): Muse Wonder Full top three on six of ten Intelligence Index evaluations
Artificial Analysis @ArtificialAnlysX
Why it matters
Independent per-benchmark results for Muse Wonder Full from Artificial Analysis’ launch-day thread.
Summary
Posted Oct 12, 2026 (17:25 UTC). First reply in Artificial Analysis’ own thread (root: x-ArtificialAnlys-2109697083519447118). Muse Wonder Full (max) ‘places in the top three on six of the ten’ Intelligence Index v4.3 evaluations: first on CritPt (33%) and GDP.pdf (33%), second on GDPval-AA v2.1 (1857 Elo), third on AA-Briefcase (1729 Elo), AutomationBench-AA (71%) and SciCode (63%). The leads on CritPt and GDP.pdf are ‘narrow, with the nearest competitors scoring 31-32%’, and the GDPval-AA result is within the confidence intervals of Claude Opus 5.5 (1866) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (1838). Terminal-Bench 4.0 rose from 33% (Muse Spark 1.3) to 57%, ‘level with Gemini 4 Argon (high)’.
Metrics as of 2026-10-13 via api.fxtwitter.com: 16,210 views, 98 likes, 7 reposts.
Archived text
Muse Wonder Full (max) places in the top three on six of the ten Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 evaluations:
➤ #1 on CritPt (33%) and GDP.pdf (33%)
➤ #2 on GDPval-AA v2.1 (1857 Elo)
➤ #3 on AA-Briefcase (1729 Elo), AutomationBench-AA (71%) and SciCode (63%)
The leads on CritPt and GDP.pdf are narrow, with the nearest competitors scoring 31-32%. On GDPval-AA v2.1, its result is within the confidence intervals of Claude Opus 5.5 (max w/ fallback, 1866) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max w/ fallback, 1838)
Its largest improvement over Muse Spark 1.3 is Terminal-Bench 4.0: 33% to 57%, bringing it level with Gemini 4 Argon (high)
